[Knightsqrss] WSJT SNR figures
Johan H. Bodin
jh.bodin at telia.com
Wed Apr 2 20:00:55 EDT 2008
Hi Johan,
Joe has choosen to "normalize" the measured SNR to a 2500Hz BW but the
WSPR decoder will see a much better SNR due to its narrow internal
filtering. If the equivalent noise BW of WSPR is 6Hz, then the SNR
improvement (power-wise) will be 2500/6 = 417 times = 26dB compared to a
2500Hz BW. In other words, when WSPR reports -26dB SNR, it actually
enjoys 0dB SNR, or so, in its decoder.
72
Johan SM6LKM
P.S.
I have added random timeslot TX with adjustable probability to the PIC
based MEPT_JT beacon. A hardware sync input has also been added for
those who don't want to use a GPS. I will post the design as soon as I
have made some more tests...
/JHB
Johan_Smet at telenet.be wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'd like to better understand the SNR values reported by WSPR.
Apparently,
> changing the RX IF-bandwidth (from 2.7 kHz to 500 Hz for instance)
does not
> affect the reported values. Why is that? Maybe because the WSPR noise
power
> sample is always recalculated into a 2.5 kHz bandwidth? Anyone for a
sound
> explanation?
>
> 73,
>
> Johan on5ex
More information about the Knightsqrss
mailing list